Strict text can wrongfully refuse.
A harmless typo or general non-conflicting description is not necessarily a discrepancy.
DOCUMENTARY CREDIT EXAMINATION · UCP 600
VERITAS-600 turns documentary-credit evidence into a traceable bank action—locking objective UCP 600 checks, constraining semantic AI, and requiring human authorization.
Deterministic checks locked · Semantic review bounded · Human sign-off required
Insurance shortfall $9,600
LC-2026-9104 · predefined evidence · not a live run
A harmless typo or general non-conflicting description is not necessarily a discrepancy.
A fluent explanation cannot make 108% insurance satisfy a 110% threshold.
Documentary compliance and regulatory exposure are distinct decisions that need distinct evidence.
Objective UCP 600 checks are calculated in Python. Nemotron is used for bounded semantic and lexical reasoning, never to override a locked discrepancy.
Guided demonstration · predefined LC-2026-9104 evidence · not a live examination.
Accepted amendments become active terms. Pending amendments remain quarantined under UCP 600 Art. 10(c) and 10(e).
Each stage has a distinct responsibility, output, and execution mode. The system does not collapse them into a single opaque “AI decision.”
Resolves active terms and routes scoped context.
Federates operational, customs, and watchlist evidence without ETL.
Calculates dates, thresholds, amounts, and locked failures.
Assesses bounded semantic questions with legal citations.
Assembles a recommendation, then requires examiner sign-off.
Every recommendation stays pending until a human examiner authorizes the consequence.
VERITAS keeps the chain visible from source record to examiner receipt, including execution provenance when the real terminal runs.
Compare the strict rule baseline, a single-prompt model, and the hybrid system across the evaluation suite.
VERITAS—600
Decision support prepares the case. Human authority releases the action.